| Core: noun, the most important part of a thing, the essence; from the Latin cor, meaning heart. |
![]() |
| Needless Commentary from Small-Town America |
|
The Weblog at The View from the Core - Thursday, November 07, 2002
|
||||
|
A Brief Roundup Thanks to Ad Orientem for noticing my Peter Jennings Report (towards the bottom), and for calling attention to this Dinesh D'Souza piece today, which may some day be seen as a prophecy. De Virtutibus has quite a few good links today. And Ut Unum Sint has a remarkable blog on some observations from a Lutheran theologian. Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 10:56:09 PM |
|
Michael Moore Has Just Given Me a Great Deal of Satisfaction Thanks to Lex Communis for leading us to this delightful piece.
Ironically, Moore may very well be right, but only at the very beginning, and not in the way he would have anticipated: Years from Now, They'll Call It "Payback Tuesday". Reading Moore's delightful rendition of proverbially Counting One's Chickens Before They Have Hatched reminded me of a comment I posted at Catholic Light yesterday, in response to the query What do you think did the democrats in this election? They believed their own propaganda. Especially that George W. Bush is dumb, and that the result of the 2000 election was the greatest scandal in American political history which every thinking individual wanted to avenge. Also, the Senate Democrats have been ruling that body with a bitterly partisan iron fist, and a lot more people noticed, and disapproved, than the Democrats thought would do so. Monumental miscalculations, I think. Moore is clearly somebody who believes his own propaganda. Fortunately, not very many other people do anymore. P.S. Okay, he may be right somewhere else, too. In light of this bit .... I promise you, at the end of the day on Tuesday, if we succeed, you will never again doubt the power of just one individual who decides that she or he can make a difference. .... allow me to refer you to my thank-you to Senator Harkin. :) Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 10:03:29 PM |
|
Does the Senate Parliamentarian Read This Weblog? Random ruminations on Senatorial rules. As I mentioned yesterday, Sens. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy have ruled their respective roosts dictatorially. If Leahy really, really didn't want a vote on a prospective judge, there wasn't a vote. That simple. If Daschle really, really didn't want a vote on just about anything he didn't like, there wasn't a vote. That simple. And The Mighty Barrister today took notice of Democratic threats of I ask you this: is that any way to run an organization of grown ups? Why do the rules give to one man (whoever he might be) so much power? Why can one man prevent a vote in a committee when he knows the committee is going to vote the way he doesn't want? Why can one man prevent a vote in the Senate when he knows the Senate will vote contrary to his desires? And why can one man effectively bring things to a stand-still if he doesn't even want discussion of a certain subject? I ask you again: is that any way to run an organization of grown ups? Why are these rules what they are? Why doesn't anybody change them? I know: everybody likes to have rules like that so they can take advantage of them if possible. But, surely, there were enough individual Senators on both sides of the aisle dismayed by the dictatorial rule of Daschle and Leahy to be able to force a change in the rules, no? How can anybody stand to be the member of a supposedly democratic, deliberative body that leaves you at the mercy or, rather, the lack of mercy of one individual? My advice to the Senate? Change the Blasted Rules! They're not in the Constitution; they're not even laws. They are just rules that the Senate has made and the Senate can unmake. Maybe you think no Republican would ever use them so tyrannically to his advantage. Do not be so naive. And maybe you think it will be a long, long time before Daschle and Leahy get back in their respective positions with a Democratic majority. Do not be so stupid. And maybe you think that nobody down the road, on either side of the aisle, will have learned from the example of Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy seeing that they did whatever they wanted to do, and nobody stopped them. Do not be so foolish. What am I missing? Somebody tell me. Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 08:01:09 PM |
|
A Closet Democrat? My readers have a sense of humor, too: You must be a closet Democrat ... with your fretting about whether the Catholic poetry page is "centrist" or "leftist" ... See Catholic Poets @ ELCore.Net. Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 06:52:48 PM |
|
Personal Note Prayers will be appreciated. I had an interview this afternoon at a local company. They are looking for someone to do general office work, but they do have a website over which they do a lot of business, and the president is thinking that the one-person team who maintains the website could probably use a backup now and, perhaps, some help in the future. The best thing about this is that it's office work close to home. As opposed to retail sales or heavy manual labor or anything far from home. Prayers for discernment all around would be appreciated. Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 06:51:31 PM |
|
All the News That's Fit to Slant Interesting errors in The New York Times. From today's Best of the Web Today: .... The Republicans' net loss of governorships doesn't seem to have been as great as expected, though you wouldn't know it from reading the New York Times, which published an error-filled map. Andrew Sullivan, who pointed this out, says there are five mistakes, but he undercounts. The Times map leaves Georgia and South Carolina blank and lists Alaska, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire and Vermont as Republican "wins." All of these states, in fact, were Republican "gains"--states whose governorships the GOP picked up from Democratic or independent incumbents. That's a total of seven errors, all in the Dems' favor.... Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 05:03:42 PM |
|
More on Maryland's Lt. Governor Elect Another reader writes: Not only is Michael Steele a black Republican, he's a practicing Roman Catholic who spent some time in an Augustinian seminary preparing for the priesthood. And despite being a Roman Catholic Marylander who left the seminary, he's pro-life. A pro-life Catholic lieutenant governor of Maryland. It will take some time getting used to the sound of that. No wonder we don't hear much about his election in mainstream media: he's got three strikes against him. ;) Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 04:42:27 PM |
|
Catholic Poets @ ELCore.Net After installing Internet Explorer 6, I noticed that the individual lines in the poems at Catholic Poets @ ELCore.Net were being centered I really hate that, and I certainly didn't want them to be rendered that way. I believe I have now adjusted the pages so the lines will be displayed left-justified in IE 6. (I don't think it was ever a problem in Netscape.) Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 08:42:16 AM |
|
Election Coverage Another reader writes: Did you notice how quickly the major networks resumed their regular programming after the results were announced this morning? If the Democrats had increased their margins, the coverage would have been endless and the gloating obscene. I had to check on Katie Couric this morning; she managed to look perky and smiley. At least she didn't wear black as she did after the Supreme Court put an end to the Florida nightmare in 2000. Peter Jennings ashen face was worth all the anguish he has caused us conservatives over these many years with his flagrantly biased reporting. When will the networks "get it"? Maybe when the FCC pulls their licenses? I can dream. I heard on the radio this morning that CBS Evening News last night did not lead with the election story! It was, they said, their third story! I think I know what their The truth is this: they did not lead with the story, because it was bad news for Democrats. They would have led with the expected story, had it come true, because it would have been bad news for the Republicans. Fortunately for all of us, more and more people are starting to see, and see through, this blatant bias. Lane Core Jr. CIW P Thu. 11/07/02 08:07:29 AM |
| The Blog from the Core © 2002-2008 E. L. Core. All rights reserved. |
| Needless Commentary from Small-Town America |
| Previous | Week | Next |
| The View from the Core, and all original material, © 2002-2004 E. L. Core. All rights reserved. |
| Cor ad cor loquitur J. H. Newman Heart speaks to heart |